<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Google OneBox put the Joy back in Enterprise Applications?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openparenthesis.org/2006/06/28/can-google-onebox-put-the-joy-back-in-enterprise-applications/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openparenthesis.org/2006/06/28/can-google-onebox-put-the-joy-back-in-enterprise-applications</link>
	<description>Because these are the early days of a long revolution . . .</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:07:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eckman.john</title>
		<link>http://www.openparenthesis.org/2006/06/28/can-google-onebox-put-the-joy-back-in-enterprise-applications#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>eckman.john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openparenthesis.org/2006/06/28/can-google-onebox-put-the-joy-back-in-enterprise-applications/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s also a presentation by Matthew Glotzbach, who works with David Girouard at Google Enterprise Services, &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.interop.com/videos/ctc06-matthew_glotzbach.wmv&quot; title=&quot;Matthew Glotzbach&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;available here&lt;/a&gt;. 

It&#039;s from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ctcevents.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Collaborative Technologies Conference&lt;/a&gt;, which was also in Boston the same week as the Sloan CIO Symposium. 

You can&#039;t see the slides in the video, but it sounds as though he&#039;s speaking from the same deck. He&#039;s a bit less cautious about CIO control, and leans more toward the employee-as-consumer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also a presentation by Matthew Glotzbach, who works with David Girouard at Google Enterprise Services, <a href="http://video.interop.com/videos/ctc06-matthew_glotzbach.wmv" title="Matthew Glotzbach" rel="nofollow">available here</a>. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s from the <a href="http://www.ctcevents.com/" rel="nofollow">Collaborative Technologies Conference</a>, which was also in Boston the same week as the Sloan CIO Symposium. </p>
<p>You can&#8217;t see the slides in the video, but it sounds as though he&#8217;s speaking from the same deck. He&#8217;s a bit less cautious about CIO control, and leans more toward the employee-as-consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eckman.john</title>
		<link>http://www.openparenthesis.org/2006/06/28/can-google-onebox-put-the-joy-back-in-enterprise-applications#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>eckman.john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openparenthesis.org/2006/06/28/can-google-onebox-put-the-joy-back-in-enterprise-applications/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Immediately on publishing this, I returned to my email and found a link to this story on Dr. Dobb&#039;s: &lt;a href=&quot;http://ddj.com/dept/cpp/189601356?cid=RSSfeed_DDJ_Cpp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Is Centralized IT Killing Innovation?&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It starts off as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Widespread user adoption of familiar, often free consumer-oriented Web tools has left IT professionals scrambling to balance permissiveness and paternalism. Fact is, workers like consumer technologies--whether instant messaging, E-mail from Yahoo or Microsoft with abundant storage, information-sharing sites, or handy Web apps--often better than the tech tools their companies prescribe. At the same time, employees shouldn&#039;t be allowed to download the latest Google beta just because they can. System security and management are still critical considerations, often with legal and regulatory teeth behind them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

But if IT pros are seen only as &quot;The Ones Who Say No,&quot; they risk surrendering their roles as innovators.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Immediately on publishing this, I returned to my email and found a link to this story on Dr. Dobb&#8217;s: <a href="http://ddj.com/dept/cpp/189601356?cid=RSSfeed_DDJ_Cpp" rel="nofollow">Is Centralized IT Killing Innovation?</a>
</p>
<p>It starts off as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p>Widespread user adoption of familiar, often free consumer-oriented Web tools has left IT professionals scrambling to balance permissiveness and paternalism. Fact is, workers like consumer technologies&#8211;whether instant messaging, E-mail from Yahoo or Microsoft with abundant storage, information-sharing sites, or handy Web apps&#8211;often better than the tech tools their companies prescribe. At the same time, employees shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to download the latest Google beta just because they can. System security and management are still critical considerations, often with legal and regulatory teeth behind them.</p>
<p>But if IT pros are seen only as &#8220;The Ones Who Say No,&#8221; they risk surrendering their roles as innovators.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

