About Me

Hi. I'm John Eckman.

John Eckman

I'm a Sr. Director at Optaros, a professional services firm offering strategy, design, development, and consulting services to enterprises interested in leveraging free and open source software.

More about me

About Open Parenthesis

Contact Me

Optaros

Travel

 

Upcoming Conferences

Web 2.0 Kongress, Hamburg

Web Content 2009

SXSW Interactive, 2009

My Tweets
  • @jennbarnett I've actually seen travelers arguing with security about wanting to bring their sno-globes. They lose, every time. 23 hrs ago
  • or maybe I'm just following too many of thw wrong people - I have not bee cultivating (or weeding) my twitter garden enough . . . 1 day ago
  • feels like it's become just another channel for spam and self-promotion. is it just the arrival of the mainstream? like when aol hit usenet? 1 day ago
  • Twitter's shine is officially gone for me. maybe I'm just tired, or its the global economic collapse, bit I'm finding it hard to tweet. 1 day ago
  • Thinking of writing a song about conference rooms and how much alike they all are. Sort of like "homeward bound" by S&G but not as good 2 days ago
  • More updates...

Posting tweet...

Powered by Twitter Tools.

Optaros Blogs
Affiliations

[FSF Associate Member]

Creative Commons
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
December 30, 2006
« Previous Post: This isn’t what I meant by social software
Next Post: Hey!Watch - Transcoding 2.0 »

Microsoft RSS

Tagged with: , , , — John @ 11:03 am

What’s really behind Microsoft’s patent applications related to RSS?

Initial reports that Microsoft was trying to “patent RSS” turn out to be at best over-simplified.

At issue isn’t RSS itself, or an RSS reader, or feed publisher. What’s at issue is the way that RSS is handled in Vista, and in the combination of IE7 and Vista.

Nick Bradbury, in “Clarifying Microsoft’s RSS-related Patents,” does a great job of explaining the two key areas where Microsoft seems to believe it has something unique:

  1. Content syndication platform: describes the Windows RSS Platform, which is built into IE7/Vista and was announced at Gnomedex 2005 three days after the patent was filed. This platform exposes an API which enables applications to access the user’s shared feed subscriptions, providing object-oriented methods for reading, adding, deleting and updating feeds regardless of their format.
  2. Finding and consuming web subscriptions in a web browser: describes an API and user interface for discovering and exposing RSS feeds to other applications (specifically web browsers).

In other words, they’re trying to patent the mechanisms built into Vista for centralizing user RSS subscription information in the host OS, and then making it available to other applications running on the system.

And this is supposed to make me feel better? Oh, all they’re trying to do is take RSS feed information out of the browser and RSS reader and store them centrally, in the OS.
I’m with Steve Borsch at Connecting the Dots, who writes in “Microsoft RSS Patent Update: Manipulate, Maneuver and Morph“:

I’m instantly suspect of an RSS engine patent — with the sweeping scope of this one — which is clearly a process patent intended to “own” not the RSS protocol…but most of the ways it will be used.

So if Microsoft is successful in this patent application, will it be covered by the agreement with Novell?

Given that MS no longer develops IE for the Mac, is Apple working on a centralized feed consumption service in OS X?

Trackback url for this post: http://www.openparenthesis.org/2006/12/30/microsoft-rss/trackback

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

« Previous Post: This isn’t what I meant by social software
Next Post: Hey!Watch - Transcoding 2.0 »