About Me

Hi. I'm John Eckman.

John Eckman

I'm a Sr. Director at Optaros, a professional services firm offering strategy, design, development, and consulting services to enterprises interested in leveraging free and open source software.

More about me

About Open Parenthesis

Contact Me

Optaros

Travel

 

Upcoming Conferences

Web 2.0 Kongress, Hamburg

Web Content 2009

SXSW Interactive, 2009

My Tweets
  • @jennbarnett I've actually seen travelers arguing with security about wanting to bring their sno-globes. They lose, every time. 21 hrs ago
  • or maybe I'm just following too many of thw wrong people - I have not bee cultivating (or weeding) my twitter garden enough . . . 1 day ago
  • feels like it's become just another channel for spam and self-promotion. is it just the arrival of the mainstream? like when aol hit usenet? 1 day ago
  • Twitter's shine is officially gone for me. maybe I'm just tired, or its the global economic collapse, bit I'm finding it hard to tweet. 1 day ago
  • Thinking of writing a song about conference rooms and how much alike they all are. Sort of like "homeward bound" by S&G but not as good 1 day ago
  • More updates...

Posting tweet...

Powered by Twitter Tools.

Optaros Blogs
Affiliations

[FSF Associate Member]

Creative Commons
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
April 27, 2007
« Previous Post: Open Source Flex (MPL)
Next Post: The Real Trouble With Twitter - There’s no There, There »

Creative Commons by default

Tagged with: , , — John @ 6:32 am

(Via Lawrence Lessig)

Sony’s new competitor to YouTube, eyeVio, will license content users upload under a Creative Commons Attribution license by default.

Lessig points to this article from Digital Trends as the source of this bit of info.

I wish Flickr would do this. Flickr already allows you to set, as an individual user, your preferences for uploaded images to default to a specific license, including several creative commons licenses, - but the global default is still “all rights reserved.”

There’s a huge difference in adoption curve when you make something the default (see this article for the debate about organ donation, which is an opt-out in many European countries but opt-in in the US).

I’d argue it is reasonable to assume that people generally want to enable some usage, when they are uploading content to a site designed to share that content. It is also reasonable to assume they want to encourage sharing when they are uploading a site which provides things like embed codes (e.g. YouTube) or guest passes (Flickr).

YouTube, in fact, doesn’t even ask you to identify a license for the content you upload - perhaps a way of ignoring the fact that you may not own the copyright in the first place? They do give you a copyright notice (’Do not upload copyrighted material for which you don’t own the rights or have permission from the owner”) but they don’t offer you any options in terms of how to present uploaded videos with respect to licensing.

Trackback url for this post: http://www.openparenthesis.org/2007/04/27/cc-by-default/trackback

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

« Previous Post: Open Source Flex (MPL)
Next Post: The Real Trouble With Twitter - There’s no There, There »