Comments on: Davenport v. McAfee: Can we get any disagreement?

By: frogpond _ Innovationsberatung » Emergence in Enterprise 2.0 implementation

frogpond _ Innovationsberatung » Emergence in Enterprise 2.0 implementation — Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:34:32 +0000

[...] concepts (add this to my post here) in Miguel Cornejo Castro’s take on the McAfee/Davenport debate (Davenport’s pov): Integrating this Ã¢â‚¬Å“emergenceÃ¢â‚¬Â paradigm into the management methods of [...]

By: Are we taking Web 2.0 too seriously? « The Manticore blog

Are we taking Web 2.0 too seriously? « The Manticore blog — Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:20:07 +0000

[...] the blogosphere taking ourselves too seriously? There has been a lot of coverage recently about the Davenport-McAfee debate on Web 2.0, and from what I’ve read the consensus is that it is still in the very early [...]

By: Communixx » Blog Archiv » Enterprise 2.0 - Kommentare zu Davenport vs. McAfee

Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:38:09 +0000

[...] 2.0 Konferenz ist mal wieder die Diskussion zwischen Tom Davenport und Andrew McAfee hochgekocht (sie haben sich in Boston ja sogar zusammen in den Ring gestellt). Das Social Computing Magazine veröffentlicht ein paar ausgewählte Zitate aus der [...]

By: frogpond _ Innovationsberatung » McAfee and Davenport debate on the value of Enterprise 2.0

Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:18:39 +0000

[...] is where the trouble (and the interesting stuff) begins, so lay your hands on the transcript that John Eckman has, view the streamed video or get it as a [...]

By: John

John — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:25:09 +0000

@Susan – you’re welcome – it was an interesting discussion, well worth watching when the video comes out.

By: The two sides of new technology « AccMan

The two sides of new technology « AccMan — Tue, 19 Jun 2007 04:53:54 +0000

[...] worth the listening. Andrew has blogged the event with his perspectives. Dan has done the same and John Eckman transcribed a good part of the conversation. A taster from John’s transcription: AM: These [...]

By: » McAfee and Davenport debate the value of Enterprise 2.0 | Between the Lines | ZDNet.com

Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:17:12 +0000

[...] John Eckman transcribed some of the action on his blog. Here is an excerpt: DF: Is there any proof that [Enterprise 2.0] is enabling true changes? [...]

By: Susan Scrupski

Susan Scrupski — Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:37:25 +0000

Thanks for this John. Really terrific. While we’re waiting for the videopodcast, this has been invaluable!

By: Quotes From the 'Enterprise 2.0 Smackdown' â€“ Davenport vs McAfee (SocialComputingMagazine.com)

Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:09:47 +0000

[...] Here is a selection of quotes from the discussion. [Thanks to Sandy Kelmsley of ebizQ and to John Eckman of Optaros.]:Davenport: "I have yet to see capitalist organizations make more money as a [...]

By: SocioBiblog

SocioBiblog — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Davenport v. McAfee: Can we get any disagreement? At E20Conference: Andrew McAfee Jevon live blogged notes

By: Mohamed Amine Chatti's ongoing research on Technology Enhanced Learning

Mohamed Amine Chatti's ongoing research on Technology Enhanced Learning — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

on the value of Enterprise 2.0. Posts related to this debate: The state of Enterprise 2.0McAfee and Davenport debate the value of Enterprise 2.0 McAfee vs. Davenport: McAfee wins 12-rounder on pointsDavenport vs. McAfee: Can we get any disagreement Watching the film of the FightThe Enterprise 2.0 Conference: Web 2.0 continues Its Move to the Workplace

By: Martin Koser _ Innovation, Technology, Design

Martin Koser _ Innovation, Technology, Design — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Which companies are blogging and wiki-ing? Interessante Zeiten Ã‚Â» Sind Sie arbeitssÃƒÂ¼chtig? Open Parenthesis Ã‚Â» Davenport v. McAfee: Can we get any disagreement?

By: Dion Hinchcliffe's Web 2.0 Blog

Dion Hinchcliffe's Web 2.0 Blog — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

my workshop session, but by all accounts it was an informative debate, even if some felt that violent agreement frequently took place. You can read good coverage of debate here from Andrew McAfee, ZDNet’s Dan Farber (who moderated the debate), and John Eckman, the latter which has a detailed transcript. For those of you who don’t know it, Andrew McAfee is the Harvard Business School professor that defined the concept of Enterprise 2.0 last year. If you’re trying to get a handle on all this, I definitely

By: Hot Links

Hot Links — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Davenport v. McAfee: 1 hour ago Linkorama : Davenport v. McAfee: – Can we get any disagreement? Tags : debate enterprise2.0 events # copy

By: Techmeme

Techmeme — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

74 minutes ago Open Parenthesis: Davenport v. McAfee: Can we get any disagreement? Find

By: Techmeme River

Techmeme River — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

3:16 AM [IMG] Open Parenthesis: Davenport v. McAfee: Can we get any disagreement?

By: Bloc Note de Bertrand DUPERRIN

Bloc Note de Bertrand DUPERRIN — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Open Parenthesis Ã‚Â» Davenport v. McAfee: Can we get any disagreement?