« Previous (Older) Post: Tripit vs. Dopplr – Travel 2.0
Next (Newer) Post: Talk of the Nation on Social Networking »

Internet TV – Joost and Miro

Tagged with: , , , , , , , — John @ 9:04 pm

Steve Borsch at Connect the Dots has a post today titled “Two approaches to internet TV: Joost and Miro.

I’ve left a brief comment there, but wanted to expand on it here. This isn’t just a question of two different approaches to delivering Internet TV – it’s a fundamental difference of passive consumption versus active participation.

The fundamental difference between Joost and Miro is seen in these two quotes.

From the Joost FAQ, section on “Content Related Questions, ” the question is “Can I upload my own videos?“:

Not at the moment. Right now, we’re concentrating on high-quality TV content from well-known TV brands, so that we can provide entertainment to the widest possible audience. Future versions of Joost may allow you to upload your own material, but we have no immediate plans for this.

As opposed to, on the GetMiro site, the entire first-level tab called create, where one reads:

How do I get my Videos on Miro?

Miro converts any media RSS feed into a channel. Don’t worry if you’ve never heard of RSS — it’s an open distribution format that works with Miro, iTunes, and lots of other tools. Many blogs and video sharing services automatically generate an RSS feed. Once you have a feed that works in Miro (please test it first!), you can submit it to the Miro Guide.

With pointers to the Make Internet TV site, where you’ll find:

We have created a detailed set of guides for shooting, editing, publishing, and promoting internet video. We think it’s the best resource anywhere. If you are getting started with creating internet video or if you want to learn more about a specific topic, it’s the best place to start.

To me, this is the clear difference between Internet TV imagined as something brought to you by “well-known TV brands” (turning the internet into TV) versus Internet TV imagined as something inherently participatory (turning TV into the internet).

It shouldn’t be hard to tell which one runs on my machine(s).

Help spread the word:


video player

Trackback url for this post: http://www.openparenthesis.org/2007/10/03/miro-joost/trackback

3 Comments for this post
  1. [...] You can read the rest of this blog post by going to the original source, here [...]

  2. Onur Orhon says:

    Thanks for the post John. Of the two, I only have experience with Joost, and I’ve been asking myself “what does this really offer me, that the TV doesn’t?”. Having canceled our TV service a couple of months ago for a 15/2 FIOS connection (and better mental health), my wife and I have been looking for entertainment alternatives online, and Joost is certainly not “it”. Not only because it offers very limited social networking features, and no user participation, but also because it comes too close to “real” TV, meaning commercials, lack of variety, mediocre content, etc.

    I’ll download Miro now and give it a try.
    -onur

  3. Shawn Blower says:

    Wait, not watching TV but spending more time on the internet improves mental health? Maybe you guys just need a hobby. Try carving balsa wood… very relaxing.

Additional comments powered by BackType

« Previous (Older) Post: Tripit vs. Dopplr – Travel 2.0
Next (Newer) Post: Talk of the Nation on Social Networking »
About Me

Open Parenthesis is a blog about free and open source software, next generation internet strategy, and the assembled web, written by John Eckman (me).

John Eckman

I'm a Sr. Director at Optaros, a professional services firm offering strategy, design, development, and consulting services to enterprises interested in leveraging free and open source software.

Optaros Labs

More about me

More About Open Parenthesis

Contact Me

John Eckman on LinkedIn

Optaros

Optaros Blogs
Creative Commons
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Lifestream