Next (Newer) Post: Open Source Year in Review (Webinar) »
The Person of the Year is Who?
As you’ve probably already heard, you’ve won Time magazine’s “Person of the Year” for 2006. Well, not you specifically, but “You,” the abstract third-second-person plural pronoun.
(Perhaps really it should be Y’all who were awarded People of the Year, but I don’t think their editors would allow that. Dan Gillmor at the Center for Citizen Media Blog suggests it should be “Us,” so as not to perpetuate the distance between traditional media and end users, but it would be strange to me to see Time declaring itself part of that particular “Us.”)
The “You” in this case wasn’t the abstract American public, though perhaps they could have been given the nod for the recent mid-term elections and the shift in policy it likely will represent, but specifically those of you/us who have contributed something to the Web. Time proclaims that the main story of 2006:
“isn’t about conflict or great men. It’s a story about community and collaboration on a scale never seen before. It’s about the cosmic compendium of knowledge Wikipedia and the million-channel people’s network YouTube and the online metropolis MySpace. It’s about the many wresting power from the few and helping one another for nothing and how that will not only change the world, but also change the way the world changes.” (emphasis added)
Isn’t it something of a long leap from YouTube and MySpace to “the many wrestling power from the few”? They do go on to note that “Web 2.0 harnasses the stupidy of crowds as well as its wisdom,” which is I suppose the necessary counterpoint to the revolutionary rhetoric in the above.
In the “Power to the People” article, the Time editors point to 15 specific examples of those who contributed to the user generated content revolution. Unfortunately, it’s a pretty mixed bag for anyone interested in the critical potential of citizen-driven media:
- Leila, the “real” Lonelygirl15
- Lane Hudson, the blogger who broke the Mark Foley scandal
- Ali Khurshid, a Pakistani who posts pictures to Flickr
- Megan Gill, a Facebook user.
- Lee Kelley, a military blogger from Wordsmith At War
- S. R. Sidarth, the person George Allen called “Macaca” on video
- Waz and Lenny from Crash Test Kitchen
- Harriet Klausner, the author of 12,896 book reviews on Amazon
- Wang Xiaofeng, “the most respected blogger in China”
- Tila Tequila, “The Madonna of MySpace”
- Smosh, posters of comedic videos to YouTube
- Kamini, a French rap artist who posted his own song online
- Simon Pulsifer, author of “between 2,00 and 3,000 Wikipedia articles” and editor of “roughly 92,000 others.”
- Kim Hye Won, a reporter for OhMyNews
- Blake Ross from the Firefox project
Nice to see some acknowledgements of places where user contributed video was something other than a cloaked ad campaign, someone dancing to the latest top 40 hit, or yet another video of a laughing baby.
By focusing on the broadest set of issues, though, Time seems to have missed a good opportunity to talk about where the real impact of user-driven media will or will not be.
Where were the links to places like OurMedia, NewAssignment, The Independent Media Center, and the Center for Citizen Media?
What happened to the many seizing power from the few?
Is it expecting to much from a mainstream media story about user contributed content that it would point the way towards something better than just America’s Funniest Videos without a decent editor?
Trackback url for this post: http://www.openparenthesis.org/2006/12/18/the-person-of-the-year-is-who/trackback
9 Comments for this postAdditional comments powered by BackType
Next (Newer) Post: Open Source Year in Review (Webinar) »
a caso, dimenticando altri aspetti meno eclatanti ma per nulla da tralasciare. Come l’ascesa del citizien journalism nelle sue varie forme, ad esempio. È quanto fa notare fra gli altri John Eckman con un post significativamente intitolato La persona dell’anno sarebbe.. chi?, ricordando inoltre che «Time sembra aver perso una buona occasione per parlare di dove andràa colpire l’impatto reale dei media creati dagli utenti. Dove sono i link a progetti quali OurMedia, NewAssignment, The Independent Media Center e Center
t think we thought of it that way, but there is a certain part where we are taking responsibility for our decision. NAN: In deciding the package and what defines this new media wave, it was very much about individuals. There wasn’t talk about organizations or projects that are moving the field forward. Koepp: Part of that is because it’s still in development. I don’t think it’s really reached fruition at this point. I think you are seeing an unorganized approach at this point, volunteers. The
at open parenthesis
Time overlooks citizen media sites…
Good point from John at open parentheses about Time’s Person of the Year story, published yesterday:Where were the links to places like OurMedia, NewAssignment, The Independent Media Center, and the Center for Citizen Media? What happened to the many …
And they mention two Flickr users Ali Khurshid and Lavannya Goradia but don’t provide links (unless I am blind)to their work.
Yeah–and what happened to Hugo Chavez who topped the poll only to be totally ignored by TIME?
Quote: «…not you specifically, but “You,†the abstract third-person plural pronoun»
————-
Isn’t it the SECOND-person?
D’oh! (Homer Simpson noise here)
You’d think a PhD in English (that’s me) would remember his first, second, and third person pronouns.
You, as in the second-person plural pronoun.
[...] Al di làdelle soliti incensamenti, la “persona dell’anno” scelta dal settimanale Time appare faccenda scontata e poco utile. Buona parte del contenuto è noto (non solo a navigatori incalliti), si dàampio spazio ai soliti nomi pur gettando nel calderone qualche sconosciuto a caso, sottovalutando e dimenticando però altri aspetti meno eclatanti eppur cruciali. Ad esempio, l’ascesa del citizien journalism nelle sue varie forme. È quanto fa notare fra gli altri John Eckman con un post significativamente intitolato La persona dell’anno sarebbe.. chi?, ricordando inoltre che «Time sembra aver perso una buona occasione per parlare di dove andràa colpire l’impatto reale dei media creati dagli utenti. Dove sono i link a progetti quali OurMedia, NewAssignment, The Independent Media Center e Center for Citizen Media?» Aggiungendo come il fondatore di quest’ultimo, Dan Gillmor, suggerisce che il soggetto più azzeccato dovrebbe essere «’Noi’, anzichè creare differenze con ‘Voi’ o ‘Tu’». Ancora più duro il sito del mensile libertario Reason: «A quel paese Time magazine. Ecco un’elenco su cui riflettere». Snocciolando alcuni nomi e spiegando che la scelta di Time indica «spossatezza editoriale… annuale mancanza d’immaginazione…bisogno disperato di vendite (l’attuale circolazione è sui 4 milioni, il 18% in meno di quella del 1988)». Radley Balko, senio editor della rivista, non manca di aggiungere che recentemente lo stesso Time ha depurato alquanto l’ufficio marketing, mentre l’affermato scrittore Dave Barry ironicamente assegna la palma di persona dell’anno proprio agli «editor di Time, per aver scoperto Internet». [...]