Can open standards and open source save us from a digital dark age?

SmartMobs posted a story yesterday about “The Looming of a Digital Dark age.”

The title of the BBC story to which they link is even more dramatic: Warning of data ticking time bomb

Both are borrowing the phase used by the chief executive of the UK National Archive, who say “the growing problem of accessing old digital files formats is a ‘ticking time bomb.'”

The BBC cuts right to the point:

The root cause of the problem is the range of proprietorial file formats which proliferated during the early digital revolution.

Technology companies, such as Microsoft, used file formats which were not only incompatible with pieces of software from rival firms, but also between different iterations of the same program.

Only in the early years? Seems to me the problem continues, and perhaps deepens.

Save your data in open, published standard formats and the worst scenario you’ll get in is the need to write a translator program to migrate old files into a new format – but at least you’ll know what format they’re in, and know that format’s specifications.

YouTube Mobile on Cingular BlackJack

Thanks to PPCGeeks.com, I finally have videos from http://m.youtube.com/ streaming on my phone. Yes, I too can watch the skateboarding dog while riding the commuter rail.

Presumably this works with lots of other Windows Mobile based devices as well, but I’ve only tried it on my Cingular BlackJack (aka Samsung i607).

You have to copy some files to the Windows directory on the device (the HTC Streaming Media player and some codecs, I assume) and install two .cab files to associate the file types with launching the streaming player.

Just follow the directions found here: YouTube Streaming Mobile: A “How To” WM5/M6/SP

I found that at Step #1, I couldn’t copy all the files from the zip into the Windows directory on my device – had to leave out the .HTM and the Shortcut – but it doesn’t seem to have mattered.

One difficulty was finding a volume control – the app seems to assume you have a touchscreen, which I have not – but the up and down on the main control wheel / compass thingie work just fine for volume.

Another quirk – full screen mode requires rotating the phone 90 degrees. Guess they were thinking of landscape.

To Liveblog or Not to Liveblog: That is the Question

Now that I’ve had some time since the Enterprise 2.0 conference, I want to reflect a bit on the experience of liveblogging directly from the conference. I have a feeling this is going to be a lengthy post, so if you’ve no interest in liveblogging pros and cons, you’ve been warned.

(Quick Summary: there’s more value in more commentary and analysis, less in transcription).

My own liveblogging from Enterprise 2.0 was inspired by many useful liveblogs I’ve read from events – especially David Wienberger (who is able to liveblog while participating as a panelist and chatting on backchannel IRC). Noting the presence of power strips in the seating areas and a working, stable wifi network (as opposed to SXSW), it just made sense to me to share the notes I was taking.

But then a comment by Andrew McAfee made me think more critically after the fact than I had at the time.

McAfee notes:

Finally, I used to think that short talks at conferences were low-pressure events, since they’d be heard by relatively few people and remembered by even fewer. A quick Google blog search, however, brings up about 30 blog posts commenting on my keynote. These will persist unless their posters take them down, and will add to the Internet’s record of my work. This is more than a bit scary for me as a speaker, but for me as a conference attendee this is great news; it means that the overall quality of talks will go up. No one wants to be examined from that many angles and found lacking.

(Just FYI – McAfee’s keynote is also freely available online in video from Altus – to me that would be even scarrier than the blogger’s reaction).

This got me to thinking, about liveblogging in particular, and asking a number of questions I probably should have thought more about a few weeks back:

  • What’s the proper etiquette for liveblogging, other than sitting in the back and typing as quietly as possible?
  • Does one need permission to liveblog a conference keynote? What about a conference panel session?
  • Would that be permission from the speaker(s)? the conference organizer(s)? both?
  • What’s the difference between blogging about an event – summaries, excerpts, and commentary – and liveblogging an event? Is it just the time difference, or the percentage of the event covered?
  • Does liveblogging get in the way of more substantive commentary?

Continue reading →

Enterprise 2.0 on Open Source

In addition to the Optaros whitepaper (“Assembling Enterprise 2.0“) I mentioned the other day, those interested in the topic of Enterprise 2.0 and open source should check out my colleague Jeff Potts’ podcast interview with Ian Howells of Alfresco.

In Jeff’s description:

In this podcast we discuss some of the details behind the Liferay-Alfresco-Roller solution Optaros recently implemented for one of our clients . . .

Or Ian’s:

Web 2.0 and Enterprise 2.0 are hot on everyone’s lips at the moment. In this Podcast I interview Jeff Potts, of Optaros, about an Alfresco application they have delivered that brings together:

  • Alfresco outside the firewall
  • Alfresco inside the firewall
  • Alfresco for document management
  • Alfresco for Web Content Management

In this Web 2.0 and Enterprise 2.0 project, Alfresco is integrated with:

  • Portal – Liferay
  • Blog – Roller
  • Tagging – Alfresco

Specifically we discuss:

  • The goals of the project
  • Web 2.0, Enterprise 2.0 and characteristics of these types of projects
  • The components used in the solution
  • The consumerization of IT – Web 2.0 Components within the Enterprise
  • How to find out more